The Ypres Times. 151 our supposed inability to make it, they had tried to encourage their troops by drawing lurid pictures of the effects of the gas. The longer the War lasted, the larger was the proportion of gas ammunition used by all the combatants and the more varied were the tasks for which it proved effective. In 1918, 28 per cent, of the German shells contained gas. The British were making great efforts to increase their production of gas to the same figure, while the American pro gramme provided for an even larger percentage of gas shells. The experience of the War certainly established the value of gas as a powerful auxiliary to existing weapons. In addition, gas added many complications to war, perhaps one of the least of these being the necessity for every man to carry a respirator. Its effects as a casualty producer may be seen from the fact that we had 180,000 gas casualties. To ascertain the relation of gas casualties to other casualties, perhaps the best country to take is America, because America came into the War when the use of gas was in full swing. America's total casualties were roughly 274,000, of which about 28 per cent, were due to gas. Surely this indicates the value of gas as a weapon of war. As regards quantities of gas used, it is understood that Germany fired nearly 31 million rounds of gas shell, while Great Britain used roughly 7 million and the French over 17 million. America made large quantities of gas, but was not able to fire any of her own gas shell prior to the Armistice. So far nothing has been said about the development of the respirator. After the first gas attack we always anticipated the enemy's intentions, and our respirator was never found wanting. The defence against mustard gas for the body generally was not, how ever, solved. The German respirator was inferior to ours in regard to gas protection, though perhaps more serviceable from the point of view of long continued wearing. It had, however, certain serious defects which were becoming more apparent as the intensity of the gas struggle developed. On the offensive side, Germany had a great advantage in that she started the study of gas first and thus was always several months ahead of the Allies. She had another great advantage owing to her highly organised and developed dye and fine chemical industry, which enabled her speedily to produce the desired products in existing plants. This branch of British chemical industry was very weak and we suffered accordingly. On at least two occasions, as far as gas is concerned, during the War of 1914-1918, the Allies had very lucky escapes from situations which might have lost them the War. The first was the occasion of the first chlorine gas attack. The German General Staff did not believe the prognostications of the scientists they therefore did not use the gas on a sufficient scale, nor were they ready to follow up and exploit such successes as they attained. The same sort of mistake was made in connection with the first use of mustard gas which, if employed in large quantities over the British front, might have produced enormous casualties at a very critical period. The mistake there was partly due to the General Staff and partly due to their technicians, who preferred to adopt a long and cumbrous method of making mustard gas to get a high standard of purity rather than a simpler method which did not give such a good product. Had they adopted the method used in this country, they could have bathed" the Allies in mustard gas. Such, in brief outline, is the history of the use of gas in the Great War it contains some lessons that we should do well to ponder over. Everyone who studies history must surely realise that in the stress of war conventions may go by the board. Chemical warfare is a weapon of enormous potentialities, particularly against an unprotected enemy and can be prepared in secret. History has shown that a weapon of value in war cannot be ruled out by agreement, nor can its development be arrested. Therefore, if a country values her safety, the only sound motto and course of action as far as chemical warfare is concerned is Be Prepared."

HISTORISCHE KRANTEN

The Ypres Times (1921-1936) | 1925 | | pagina 9